"The swings have been criticized by
developers and smart-growth
activists alike, who say the members bring a measure of uncertainty to
a land-use process that ought to be consistent and fair.
" 'Here we go again,' said developer John A. Andrews II, after voters
Tuesday ousted four incumbents who had won office in 2003 on a pledge
to loosen controls on growth. 'Every four years it's the same thing.'
"Board Chairman Scott K. York (I), one of eight winning candidates who
campaigned on a promise to rein in 'overdevelopment,' said Thursday
that it is premature to put ideological labels on the new board, which
includes four Democratic newcomers whom York said he barely knows.
"He
said he hopes the panel will continue the legacy of the 2000-04 board,
which sought to control development in the county's rural west,
concentrate most of the building in the suburban east and preserve a
semi-rural zone in between. Several of the candidates who won seats
Tuesday concurred with that approach during their campaigns.
" 'What I hope occurs with this board is that we will end up taking an
approach that is a little sturdier [than the current board], following
up on what the previous board did and not salivating to open up much of
the county to a higher density of residential growth, which is what
some members of the current board wanted to do,' York said.
"York cited protection of the 'transition area,' which serves as a
buffer between the east and the rural two-thirds of the county, as a
high priority. The board last year considered opening up the transition
area to suburban-style development, but the proposal to allow as many
as 33,800 houses in the area known as Dulles South ultimately failed.
"When the pro-growth Republican majority swept into office in 2003, one
of their main goals was to turn back the previous board's stringent
restrictions on building in western Loudoun. The Republicans
said those rules, which had reduced the total number of houses allowed
in the rural west from about 37,000 to 10,000, impinged on landowners'
rights to do what they wanted with their properties.
"After the Virginia Supreme Court threw out the regulations on a
technicality, the Republican-led board approved rules allowing the
development of about 18,000 houses. York was among those who favored a
stricter set of regulations.
"Asked last week whether the new board would revisit that policy, York
said it was far too early to know how the board would handle any
specific issue. But he added that he expects 'nothing radical in
nature' when the board takes office in January.
"The eight successful slow-growth candidates were part of a slate
endorsed by Voters for Loudoun's Future, a nonpartisan
organization. But the eight are a diverse group: five Democrats, two
independents and a Republican who was elected on a pro-growth platform
in 2003.
"To underscore that they were not 'anti-growth,' York and the other
candidates on the slate said during campaigning that they favored more
commercial development in Loudoun to strengthen its tax base.
"Andrea McGimsey (D), who unseated Bruce E. Tulloch (R) in the Potomac
District, said Thursday that she supports manageable and well-planned
growth. McGimsey has been portrayed by critics as a hard-liner on the
growth issue because she led a group affiliated with the Piedmont
Environmental Council.
" 'This whole characterization of slow-growth versus pro-growth, I
think,
really misses the mark,' she said. 'I ran on reasonable growth. This
board kept trying to turbo-charge the growth.'
"McGimsey said she hopes to stay true to the guidelines that created
the
transition area between the east and the west.
"She said she also hopes to focus on the county's existing communities.
As one of her first orders of business, she said, she wants to look at
whether the roads and other amenities in Loudoun's
suburban communities meet county guidelines. For example, she said,
Ashburn has tens of thousands of residents but no county-run recreation
center.
"Eugene A.
Delgaudio (R-Sterling), the only pro-growth incumbent who was
reelected, said he is 'keeping an open mind' about the new group. But
he would be willing to fight his colleagues if they proposed extreme
environmental measures, he said."
