Home Page Prince William Citizens for Balanced Growth (PWCBG)
Balancing residential growth with traffic, tax, local economic, school, and quality-of-life issues

scale
          Bottom of Page 
LOccoquan

Brentswood 2005-06



"Brentswood Plan Hearing Delayed [16 May 2006]; Changes in Works"
(by Rose Murphy, Bull Run Observer, 19 May 2006, p. 1)


Note:  In a 15 March 2005 vote on Brentswood, the PW Board of County Supervisors (BOCS) voted 5-3 to allow the proposal to be sent through the county's rezoning process.  This made it necessary for the proposal to be formally studied by the county Planning Staff and formally voted on by both the county Planning Commission and the BOCS.  The following supervisors voted in March 2005 to keep the proposal alive and send it through the formal rezoning process:  Chairman Sean Connaughton, Wally Covington, Hilda Barg, Martin Nohe, and John Jenkins.  Voting against further consideration:  Corey Stewart, John Stirrup, and Maureen Caddigan.



Experts:  Brentswood Proffers, Promises Do Not Withstand Scrutiny; Project Would Impose "Huge Financial Burden" on County
("Costs, Amenities, Proffers of Brentswood Analyzed at G'ville Town Meeting" by Rose Murphy, Bull Run Observer,
21 April 2006, p 7)


Brookfield Homes' Claims of Road Improvements To Accompany Brentswood
(map from Brookfield website Oct 2005 and Brookfield-sponsored public open houses early 2006 to promote Brentswood)



Mar 2005:  Supervisors vote 5-3 to keep Brentswood plan alive; activists debate county Comprehensive Plan requirement that Rural Crescent be preserved through sparse development, no sewer lines
("Brentsville, Woodbridge Developments to Proceed" by Nikita Stewart, Washington Post, 17 March 2005, p. T1)



ArrowUp(b&w)  Media Commentary:
"Board Is Wrong To Defer Developers"
("Letter": "Board is Wrong To Defer Developers" by Michael Ragland, Gainesville Times, 15 Sep 2006, p A4)

Chairman Connaughton Chided for Disingenuousness on Brentswood
("Opinion" by Ralph Stephenson, Gainesville Times, 26 May 2006, p A4)

After Receiving $863K From Developers, Chairman Connaughton Should Recuse Himself From Brentswood Vote
(Letter to Editor by Ralph & Kathy Stephenson, Potomac News, 4 May 2006)

Conservative Blogger Views Supervisor Covington's Support for Brentswood, Pros & Cons of Plan
(by Charles Reichley, 8 April 2006, "Two Conservatives" blog [
"two Prince William conservatives' posting about Virginia politics and other topics of interest"]:  "Opposition to Brentswood Development")



ArrowUp(b&w)  Organizations Opposed to Brentswood:

County Planning Staff Report, Planning Commission Recommend Denial of Brentswood (10 May 2006)
  


County Democratic Party Committee Resolution Opposing Brentswood (27 April 2006)
County Republican Party Committee Resolution Opposing Brentswood (1 April 2006)
  


PWCBG Flier Opposing Brentswood: front side
(distributed April-May 2006 to Brentsville & Gainesville residents)
  
PWCBG Flier Opposing Brentswood: back side
(distributed April-May 2006 to Brentsville & Gainesville residents; same as "Facts About the Proposed Brentswood Development" immediately below)


ArrowUp(b&w)  Facts About the Proposed Brentswood Development

1. INCREASED TRAFFIC CONGESTION – Brentswood includes 5,000-6,800 mostly high-density homes and 876,000 square feet of retail space.  This is four times the maximum number of dwellings currently intended in the County’s Comprehensive Plan -- any number over approximately 1,400 units is excessive, and would add to the County’s existing 30 to 50 year supply of housing opportunities on undeveloped land.  It will bring 20-30,000 more people and will put at least 15,000 more cars on Devlin and Linton Hall roads, Lee Highway, Rt. 28 and I-66 -- roads that already back up for miles during rush hour. 

Brookfield Homes, the developer, claims it will offset traffic impacts by accelerating completion of road projects such as the I-66/Rt. 29 interchange.  According to Brentsville Supervisor Wally Covington, “the only reason we’re looking at this proposal now is that it offered the transportation improvements.”  (Washington Post April 2, 2006)  However, Gainesville Supervisor John Stirrup says that given the need to acquire nearly 100 businesses, identify and relocate utilities, and comply with Federal environmental requirements, Brookfield will be unable to commence construction of the projects any sooner than could the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). 

Moreover, the proffers include no timetable for starting any of the road projects outside Brentswood.

2. BROOKFIELD PROFFERS PAID WITH $170 MILLION OF TAXPAYERS’ MONEY – If a financial offer sounds too good to be true, it inevitably is.  Brookfield’s offer of millions of dollars in proffers to Prince William taxpayers is no exception.  According to the proffers, Brookfield will receive reimbursement for most of the cost of the off-site transportation improvements from already appropriated Federal and state funds.  Furthermore, the proposed off-site transportation improvements depend on Prince William County (PWC) approval of a Community Development Authority (CDA) to issue bonds to finance those improvements.  The bonds would be repaid through special assessments on residents and the reimbursement from VDOT.  However, the PWC government has stated that the Brentswood CDA application is not consistent with County policy.  If the CDA is not established, Brookfield has no obligation to make any off-site road improvements. 

3. CROWDED SCHOOLS WITH CONSTANTLY CHANGING BOUNDARIES – Over the past decade, uncontrolled growth has required the construction of numerous schools, causing our children to be shuffled frequently from school to school.  This project would add children from 5,000 to 6,800 new residences to already overcrowded schools.  Brookfield has offered to address this problem by donating two vacant lots for elementary schools and one for a high school, for which it would receive a credit against the monetary proffers it would otherwise owe.

4. HUGE UNFUNDED TAX LIABILITIES ON PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY CITIZENS – Based on Prince William County’s proposed FY2007 fiscal plan and tax rate, the resulting annual shortfall in real estate tax revenue for 6,800 units (subsidy required to maintain current levels of service) would be $18,800,000, which would increase with inflation over time.  The likely result to Prince William County citizens will be a combination of reduced services (schools, police, fire, transportation, etc.) and higher tax bills to subsidize new development.  The long-run value of the Brentswood subsidy from Prince William County citizens is $2.5 billion.

5. WORSENING OF THE ALREADY WEAK RATIO OF COMMERCIAL TO RESIDENTIAL LAND IN PWC’S TAX BASE -- Communities maintain high levels of public services and hold the line on taxes for citizens by pursuing economic development that produces a balanced mix of commercial and residential development.  Our county’s ratio has been deteriorating and Brentswood would accelerate that negative trend.  Approval of the rezoning would cause Prince William County to forfeit the potential to create large numbers of high-paying jobs on approximately 671 acres of prime commercial/industrial land.  Moreover, the commercial development Brookfield proposes is unlikely to materialize.  The independent analysts hired by the County conclude that Brookfield has planned more offices and stores than the market can support and this could cause Brookfield to come back later with a request to change the plan to add even more houses, as other developers have done in the past.




Home Page  | Return to Top